The Supreme Court

The Provincial High Court of Álava proved the defendant's defence and the Public Prosecutor's Office right, believing that the facts were better suited to a crime of injury, together with reckless homicide, which would prevent the case from being tried before a popular jury.

During the trial to investigate whether the masks were purchased fraudulently, Ábalos's former advisor has said he handled numerous offers and doesn't remember if the winning offer was sent to him by Aldama. 

During the trial for the fraudulent purchase of masks, the businessman told the judge that some construction companies won public works tenders in exchange for paying commissions.

The European Court of Human Rights has sentenced Spain ten times for failing to investigate these cases of torture. Giza Human Rights Observatory has announced its readiness to take the case to the United Nations Organization. 

In his statement to the Supreme Court, the former president of Adif has denied having been under any pressure to buy the musu or plug anyone in.

After the European ruling, the Supreme Court will decide how to comply. Counsel proposes the figure of the fixed to be extinguished. ELA recalls the Supreme Court's rulings against this matter and calls for further mobilizations.

Patricia Uriz, who has testified in the trial against Ábalos, Koldo García and Aldama, has denied using codified language to refer to money, while other witnesses have explained cash payments and operations related to the mask case.

According to the Public Prosecutor's Office, there is insufficient evidence to indicate that the e-mail sent by Amador's lawyer, Alberto González, was sent by the Public Prosecutor's Office.

The businessman has said he took two payments of 45,000 euros to the PSOE headquarters and has stated that Ábalos "wanted a house" for his efforts on the hydrocarbon licence.

According to the witness, the former minister only sent him links to job offers, and Koldo Garcia told him from the beginning that he was his "boss" at the public company.

Both organizations have filed their submissions with the Court of Guarantees of the Treaty requesting the admission of the application for amparo filed by the former president against the Supreme Court's decision not to apply amnesty for embezzlement. Both organizations believe that the Supreme Court should have applied amnesty to him and criticize the "unreasonable and arbitrary" interpretation of the Amnesty Act to prevent its application.

Zulueta was sentenced to seven and a half years' imprisonment for ETA membership, possession of weapons and explosives, and command of Halboka, while Enparantza  was sentenced to four years' imprisonment for ETA membership.

The Supreme Court has announced that it is not competent to investigate the former Minister's resignation from the Act of Deputies.

The Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal in cassation filed by the defence of the convicted person and found him guilty of a crime of hyper-aggravated murder.

According to Judge Leopoldo Puente, although the crimes under investigation fall within the competence of the National High Court, Ábalos has been aphored by the Supreme Court. 

The Public Prosecutor's Office considers that some of the fundamental rights of the former Spanish Attorney General  have been violated and therefore requests the annulment of the sentence. 

The Supreme Court has found it proven that he or someone around him, who was aware of it, leaked to the Ser chain the e-mail of Alberto González, the lawyer of Amador, the couple of the President of the Community of Madrid.

The Government will be left with one less Member, since Ábalos has tended to vote in line with the PSOE, and given that Junts has announced his vote against all the Government's proposals, things will become a little more difficult for the Government in Congress.